5 6 7 8 6 10 Yes. Q. Again, on that 407 referral, that was actually given to you when? A. We made the decision in the office of Enforcement to seek that authority in September of '86. Q. I'm sorry. When were you actually granted it? December. Q. Now, did you find any information in the statement of concern when you reviewed it that you found to be incorrect? MR. MCALEER: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Objection. THE WITNESS: I don't recall making any conclusions about inaccuracies. Q. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) All right. As you sit here today, do you know whether or not there were in fact inaccuracies in that statement? MR. MCALEER: Objection. Number two, we are talking about, I think, STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 11 12 13 14 15 16 It was not a typical document, so wasn't really any norm. there Q. Can you think of any other documents that you have seen in your enforcement history that don't tell the reader who the author is? A. It's very common for us to get draft exan reports, you know, one chunk of a report or one set of consents. 20 21 22 23 24 from the examination report, it was not presented in the same format that an exan report would have been Q. I think you said you got two or three drafts before the final, to your memory? STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. Q. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Was there a cover letter? A. Not on any that I saw, no. I was getting them secondhand through Steve Hershkowitz. Q. Were there any instructions that accompanied that statement of concern that you are aware of? A. No. Q. and again, ma'am, your understanding of its purpose was what? A. It was a preliminary draft of the problems that the district was finding with Lincoln Savings. Q. One of the things that you are concerned about from a confidentiality standpoint is protecting the interests of the federal -1. I don't believe I have ever looked at it that way. Q. Who are the confidentiality requirements intended to protect in your view? STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 7 9 10 11 regulations, nor to my knowledge did she have a THE WITNESS: I believe they are designed institution, whose names are going to appear in exam reports or subpoenas, or whatever else night be involved. Q. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) Do you know when 505 was enacted? 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 What did you do with the statement of draft of it? What did you then do with it? 146 DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. I 147 2 report was going to be bigger and better. 3 ne? When did you receive it? Did you tell 9 10 11 12 Q. Did you do anything, between the time you received the final draft in December and the from the time you received the final draft to the end of the year? 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A. There was one area that my office looked into involving an allegation that someone investigative authority to pursue. Q. Back in September? A. Yes. That is in the meno of recommendation. STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. |