DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. II believe from some source that the DOJ decided not to pursue those, and then I was under-the impression that maybe additional referrals were 1 2 3 16 17 Since we happen to be at an advantageous point, we will consider with precision what we can or can't say, and we will let you know. And if you feel a need to go to 24 25 I don't know. But as far as I'm concerned, the 4STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. to do it. MR. GALLAGHER: Why don't we conclude the video at this point. We may want to keep the written record on scheduling. 388 3 390 7 BE IT KNOWN that the foregoing deposition was taken by me pursuant to order of the court; that I was then and there authorized by order of the court to administer an oath; that the witness before testifying was duly sworn by me to testify to the whole truth and nothing but the truth; that the questions propounded by counsel and the answers of the witness thereto were taken down by me in shorthand and thereafter transcribed either by me or under my direction, and that the foregoing pages of printed matter contain a full, true and accurate transcript of all proceedings and testimony had and adduced upon the taking of said deposition all to the best of my skill and ability. I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am in no way related to any of the parties hereto nor an I in any way interested in the outcome hereof. 10 11 12 13 DATED at Phoenix, Arizona, this day of 1990. STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. Senator Riegle has no present recollection of any substantive conversation with Mr. Atchison at that time or at any time. Although his office records show that Mr. Atchison was scheduled for a short meeting of the afternoon of February 26, 1987. In fact, Senator Riegle, is not certain that any meeting actually took place. - in a On some date after the 26th, he received an unsolicited letter signed by Mr. Atchison on Author Young stationary format which was created exclusively by the letter writer. Senator Riegle has since learned that virtually the same was addressed and sent to other in the same format letter - SPECIAL COUNSEL 02/22/89 18:21:52 02/22/89 18:55:41 02/22/89 19:12:50 02/22/89 19:13:18 02/22/89 19:14:32 02/22/89 19:34:45 02/24/89 08:57:55 02/24/89 18:21:58 02/26/89 17:32:54 02/27/89 15:02:54 02/27/89 15:06:36 02/27/89 17:31:00 02/27/89 17:32:42 (202)224-1574 12/02/88 11:06:39 12/02/88 11:18:30 12/02/88 11:22:18 12/02/88 11:23:52 12/02/88 11:24:48 12/02/88 11:25:47 12/02/88 11:47:02 12/02/88 13:05:39 12/02/88 13:18:58 02/01/89 17:01:20 02/02/89 12:58:07 02/02/89 14:09:10 02/03/89 10:55:01 02/03/89 10:58:24 02/03/89 11:59:58 02/10/89 11:30:54 02/10/89 11:33:37 02/10/89 11:34:20 (517)373-0837 (602) 965-1258 (313)625-8557 (212)530-7373 (313)587-4700 (212)504-3302 (212)989-6092 (313)545-5159 (512)280-4808 (615) 320-1021 (313)827-1280 (315)475-8898 (212)504-3302 (615)320-1021 (313)827-1280 1 14.0 (408)625-4080 0 57.0 (203)685-5122 09.0 (203)972-1522 O 24.0 (203)972-1522 6 58.0 (203)972-2897 0 13.0 (415)254-2978 48.0 (313)827-1280 13 14.0 (615)320-1021 0 40.0 (415)884-1787 O 14.0 (415)884-1787 10 8.0 0 18.0 1 8.0 0 2.0 2 52.0 0 41.0 0 37.0 0 8.0 958.0 (415)983-7425 SAN FRAN CA (212)504-3302 NEW YORK NY (203)972-2897 (716)481-8382 (216) 382-0885 (212)929-4483 (212)977-9700 (716)481-8382 (718)454-2140 0 1.0 (716)481-9382 0 27.0 (716)481-8382 35 4.0 (718)481-8382 (513)498-2111 NEW CANAANCT ROCHESTER NY PHILA PA NEW YORK NY NEW YORK NY ROCHESTER NY ROCHESTER NY ROCHESTER NY ROCHESTER NY ROCHESTER NY SIDNEY OH 0 47.0 O 24.0 (513)498-2111 SIDNEY OH 32 39.0 (513)498-2111 SIDNEY ON 0 7.0 (513)498-2111 SIDNEY ON 12 2.0 (513)498-0800 SIDNEY OH SIDNEY ON SOUTH BENDIN (212)977-8700 Kevin Gottlieb R000402 SPECIAL COUNSEL |