A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt, of the Proceedings, Findings and Sentence, of the General Court Martial: In the Case of Major General Fitz John Porter, and a Vindication of that Officer
John Murphy & Company, 1863 - 88 páginas
Opinião das pessoas - Escrever uma crítica
Não foram encontradas quaisquer críticas nos locais habituais.
Outras edições - Ver tudo
A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt of the Proceedings ...
Visualização integral - 1863
A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt
Pré-visualização indisponível - 2017
A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt, of the Proceedings ...
Pré-visualização indisponível - 2016
answer appear arms army attack attempt authority believe belligerent better bill called cause character citizens civil claim command committed condition Congress considered Constitution course Court danger direct doubt duty effect election enemy England English equipped evidence executive existence fact fitted force foreign give given Government ground Habeas Corpus hand hold House intent issue Judge Advocate judgment justice law of nations less liberty limitation matter means ment military nature necessary neutral never object obligations officers opinion party passed peace person political Pope port Porter position present President principle privilege protection proved provisions question reason rebellion rebels received reference relations require respect rule ship slave slavery statute supposed taken thing thought tion Union United vessel violation whole witness Writ
Página 12 - Texas, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals by law...
Página 9 - IT is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual, his life, liberty, property and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as free, impartial and independent as the lot of humanity will admit.
Página 27 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Página 6 - ... employed in. the service of any foreign prince, state, or potentate, or of any foreign colony, province, or part of any province or people...
Página 7 - Majesty, for that purpose first had and obtained as aforesaid, shall, by adding to the number of the guns of such vessel, or by changing those on board for other guns, or by the addition of any equipment for war...
Página 47 - The modern usage of nations, which has become law," — mark the words, Mr. Speaker, — " the modern usage of nations, which has become law," — — " would be violated ; that sense of justice and of right, which is acknowledged and felt by the whole civilized world, would be outraged, — if private property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled.
Página 5 - On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors.
Página 203 - Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures, of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions.
Página 16 - Oh! happy state! when souls each other draw, When love is liberty, and nature law: All then is full, possessing and possess'd, No craving void left aching in the breast: Ev'n thought meets thought, ere from the lips it part, And each warm wish springs mutual from the heart.