No interior do livro
Resultados 1-3 de 65
Página 1293
Period 1 Period 10 Period 20 Period 30 Period 30 - period 1 Panel A. Low bankruptcy group estimates Female Male Bus / econ Bus / econ Other majors 1.0335 3.9194 8.3091 ( 1.2297 ) ( 0.9093 ) *** ( 0.9873 ) * *** 6.8261 ( 1.0877 ) ...
Period 1 Period 10 Period 20 Period 30 Period 30 - period 1 Panel A. Low bankruptcy group estimates Female Male Bus / econ Bus / econ Other majors 1.0335 3.9194 8.3091 ( 1.2297 ) ( 0.9093 ) *** ( 0.9873 ) * *** 6.8261 ( 1.0877 ) ...
Página 1311
Given this , by the same argu- ment as above , all captive buyers in period 3.1 will breach in period 3.2 . Since all buyers will breach , R can profitably cover its fixed cost of f . Thus , it will enter in period 2 given this equilib- ...
Given this , by the same argu- ment as above , all captive buyers in period 3.1 will breach in period 3.2 . Since all buyers will breach , R can profitably cover its fixed cost of f . Thus , it will enter in period 2 given this equilib- ...
Página 1317
If I offers an exclu- sive contract in period 1 that is binding only in period 3.3 if all buyers sign the contract and none breach it , then , for any value of f , in the unique subgame perfect equilibrium all buy- ers sign this ...
If I offers an exclu- sive contract in period 1 that is binding only in period 3.3 if all buyers sign the contract and none breach it , then , for any value of f , in the unique subgame perfect equilibrium all buy- ers sign this ...
Opinião das pessoas - Escrever uma crítica
Não foram encontradas quaisquer críticas nos locais habituais.
Índice
EDMUND S PHELPS | 541 |
O 2 0 2007 | 713 |
ALMA COHEN AND LIRAN EINAV | 745 |
Direitos de autor | |
8 outras secções não apresentadas
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
agents aggregate American Economic Review analysis assets assume assumption average behavior benchmark Beveridge curve business cycles candidates capital changes choice coefficient cointegration consumer consumption contracts correlation cost of business countercyclical deductible degree distributions distribution durables effect empirical equation equilibrium estimated exchange expected Figure firms function given growth HIP model households implies impulse responses income increase individuals inflation inventory investment investment rate Journal of Economics labor market loss aversion marginal likelihood matching Matthew Rabin ment Michael Woodford monetary policy nodes nomic observed optimal output pairs paper parameters patients percent policy shock post.com preferences procyclical production Proposition random regime relative response risk aversion sample Section sector Shapley value side payments simulations sticky prices stochastic Table theory tion tradable unemployment utility variables variance volatility vouchers wage workers Yangzi Delta