 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 780 páginas
...confined to a criminal prosecution. The general rule, however, is that where a statute imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit of others, if he neglects or refuses to perform such duty, he is liable for any injury or detriment caused by such neglect or... | |
 | 1884 - 1022 páginas
...protection or benefit of others, if such person or corporation neglects to perform that duty, he or it is liable to those for whose benefit it was imposed,...for any damages sustained by reason of such neglect ; McCatt v. Chamberlain, 13 Wis. 637 ; Dtmnigan v. C. & NW Ry. Co., 18 Id. 28 ; Scott v. Shepherd,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1890 - 1014 páginas
...well settled, certainly in this state, that where a statute or municipal ordinance imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit...of others, if he neglects to perform that duty he ia liable to those, for whose protection or benefit it was imposed, for any injuries of the character... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1891 - 1028 páginas
...confined to a criminal prosecution. The general rule, however, is, that where a statute imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit of others, if he neglects or refuses to perform such duty, he is liable for any injury or detriment caused by such neglect or... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1891 - 1038 páginas
...intercourse, titale v. Miller, 418. See MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, 10. DAMAGES. 1. IT A STATTTTB IMPOSES UPOH ANY PERSON a specific duty for the protection or benefit of others, if ha neglects or refuses to perform such duty he is liable for any injury or detriment caused thereby,... | |
 | 1899 - 914 páginas
...held in Osborne v. McAlastcfi, 40 Minn. 103, where a statute or municipal ordinance imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit...that duty, he is liable to those for whose benefit or protection it was imposed, for any injuries of the character which the statute or ordinance was... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, William Wilcox Cooke, Joseph Brown Heiskell, Jere Baxter, Benjamin James Lea, George Wesley Pickle, Charles Theodore Cates, Frank Marian Thompson, Charles Le Sueur Cornelius, Roy Hood Beeler - 1899 - 832 páginas
...Masters, 12 Am. Rep., 698, where a statute or municipal ordinance Weeks v. McNulty. imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit...that duty he is liable to those for whose benefit or protection it was imposed for any injuries of the character which the statute or ordinance was designed... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1900 - 1050 páginas
...McMasters, 40 Minn. 103, 12 Am. St. Rep. 698, where a statute or municipal ordinance 5O3 imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit...that duty he is liable to those for whose benefit or protection it was imposed for any injuries of the character which the statute or ordinance was de*... | |
 | 1904 - 1256 páginas
...this state, and it Is now well settled that, where a statute or municipal ordinance Imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit...perform that duty he is liable to those for whose protection or benefit It was imposed for any injuries of the character which the statute or ordinance... | |
 | 1905 - 1736 páginas
...statute or municipal ordinance mposes upon any person a specific dufy for the protection or «nefit of others, if he neglects to perform that duty he is liable o those for whose protection or benefit it was imposed for any injuries of the character which the... | |
| |
It is now well settled, certainly in this state, that where a statute or municipal ordinance imposes upon any person a specific duty for the protection or benefit of others, if he neglects to perform that duty he is liable to those for whose protection... 
