Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

v Miller, 18 Pa. St. 52.....

v. Mitchell (Wash.), 213 Pac. 10..

169, 199

134

v. San Rafael and San Quentin R. R. Co., 50 Cal. 417..20, 148

Whitla v. Taylor, 6 La. Ann. 480...

....

Whittier v. Wilbur, 48 Cal. 175....

Wicker v. Messinger, 22 Ohio Circuit Court 712.

Wigton's Appeal, 28 Pa. St. 161.....

Wilcox v. Stephenson, 30 Fla. 377..

Wilcox Manufacturing Co. v. Brazos, 74 Conn. 208..

Wilemet Steam etc. Co. v. Los Angeles College Co., 94 Cal.

203

169

119

196

146

141

139

[ocr errors][merged small]

239

Willets v Earl, 53 N. J. L. 270.

Willey v. Topping, 146 Pa. St. 427..

Williar v. Nagle, 109 Maryland 75..

Wills et al. v. Abbey et al., 27 Texas 202..

Wilson v. Borden, 68 N. J. L. 627...

Wilson v. Ward, 14 British Col. 131.

Winder v. Caldwell, 14 How. U. S. 434.

.......

Windrim v. Philadelphia, 9 Philadelphia, Pa. 550.....
Withrow L. Co. v. Glasgow etc. Co., 101 Fed. 863..
Wolf v. Pa. R. Co., 29 Pa. Sup. Ct. 439....

Wollreich v. Fettretch, 4 N. Y. Supp. 326..
Womble v. Hickson, 91 Arkansas 266...
Wong v. Rink, 24 Hawaii 181.......

199 48

8 127

48

190

.104, 107

.167, 169

[blocks in formation]

Wood v. Donaldson, 17 Wend. (N. Y.) 550, 22 Wend. 395... 202 Woodruff v. Rochester & Pittsburgh R. R. Co., 108 N. Y.

39.... .17, 18, 22, 28 Woolf v. Schaefer, 103 N. Y. A. D. 567, 41 Misc. N. Y. 640. 191 Wright v. Eisle, 86 N. Y. A. D. 356...

v. Meyer (Tex. Civ. App. 1894), 25 S. W. Rep. 1122.....

v. Pohls, 83 Wis. 560.....

Wyman v. Hooker, 2 Cal. App. 36, 83 Pac. 79.

Wymard v. Deeds, 21 Pa. Super. Ct. 332..

[blocks in formation]

PART I

THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER

CHAPTER I

THE RELATIONSHIP IN GENERAL

§ 1. Similar to Other Professional Relationships. The relationship existing between the architect and his client is very similar to and, in many respects, substantially identical with, the relationship existing between an attorney and his client and a physician and his patient.1 In each case the professional man is in a position of trust and confidence. In each he is the recognized agent of his client. In each he is assumed to possess, by virtue of the nature of his calling, a special degree of skill and ability therein. In each, but as to this infinitely more in the case of the attorney or physician than in the case of the architect, he is under certain obligations to the public and to the State.

In recent years the similarity of the Architectural to the other Professions has been increased by the movement for the registration of Architects.

The movement has spread rapidly and registration laws have been adopted by many of the states. These laws differ, some slightly, some materially. The underlying purpose of all of them is never1 Coombs v. Beede, 89 Me. 187.

« AnteriorContinuar »