...nos. 3578, 3578-A, and 3578-B are not unjustly discriminatory or unfair as between carriers, and do not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States; and that complainant is not entitled to reparation. An appropriate order dismissing the complaint will...

...each unit in excess of 5. Minnesota imposes a similar tax at lower rates. OTHER TRADES EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS Congress, from time to time,...associations for the purpose of engaging in the export trade. 25 The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 authorized marine insurance companies to enter into "any...

...importers, or ports, or between exporters from the United States and their foreign competitors, would not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, and would not be in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916. A memorandum of the agreement between the...

...Importers, or posts, or between exporters from the United States and their foreign competitors : does not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States: and is not in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, provided that the form of contract of the North...

...importers, or posts, or between exix>rters from the United States and their foreign competitors ; does not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States; and is not in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, provided that the form of contract of the North...

...importers, or posts, or between exporters from the United States and their foreign competitors : does not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States; and is not in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, provided that the form of contract of the North...

...competitors. Further found that said agreement la not In violation of the Shipping Act, 1916. will not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, and is not contrary to the public interest. FMB Agreement No. 8D55 approved, pursuant to Section 15...

...competitors. They further found that said agreements are not in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, will not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, and are not contrary to the public interest. On April 18, 1962, the Department of Justice advised the...

...competitors. Further found that said agreement is not in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, will not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, and is not contrary to the public interest. FMB Agreement No. 8555 approved, pursuant to Section 15...

...convenience, did not result in any unfair or unjust discrimination against ports, carriers or shippers, did not operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, and did not violate any of the provisions of the Shipping Act, 1916. Absorption of Insurance Premiums,...