DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. I MR. GALLAGHER : Let's mark this as the exhibit next in order. Let's go off the record for a second. identification.) Q. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) Let me hand you, - MR. MAGGIO: Hold on. Let's go off the record here. (an off-the-record discussion ensued.) NR. MAGGIO: Back on the record at 2:32. 9. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) Ms. Stewart, let me hand you what has been marked as Exhibit 50, which I understand to be a copy of the December 24th, 1986 Wall Street Journal article. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 can tell? And all I am going to ask you is if that's the article you were referring to, if you MR. WHITE: Do you have a copy? MR. MCALEER : Do you have a copy of the exhibit? THE WITNESS : This article was dated when? STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. TELEPHONE 283-9435 N 152 DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. I 1 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 wondering if you are able to confirm that? Yes, that is the article. Q. My copy is awfully difficult to read, and I'm not going to try to put you through any chore of that. I will ask you if, just by looking at it, you can pick out easily any of the information that Mr. Sauzynski suggested cane from his work? A. He did not tell me in any detail at all what information he had provided that he was concerned about. Q. You saw that article at or about the time well, I guess you saw that article on the I did. 13 14 15 And can you be anymore specific about what Mr. Sauzyanski told you was his work product, if you will, that's in the article? .A. I don't believe he did tell me. It was merely a comment by him that information he had collected had appeared in this article. I assumed it was all of the confidential STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 153 1 2 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 of paper in his hand while you were talking? A. He had the newspaper. Q. Oh, it wasn't workpapers or something he had numbers on, or something? A. Correct. Q. Did he tell you what form he had put call to San Francisco. It was not something that 21 that was all or just part of. Q. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) Did he happen to tell you who he had talked with in San Francisco? Q. Do you know today who he talked with? 2 3 DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. I a week or so ago, did that topic come up as to who he may have gotten the conversation from? MR. MCALEER: Objection. THE WITNESS: No. 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 attitude when you read this Wall Street Journal MR. MURPHY: I'm going to object to the 8. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) What exactly did you do about that? A. Well, I thought about it over the Christmas holiday. And in early January I wrote a neno to Chairman Gray. Q. That would have been on January 8th, I 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 believe? Prior to sending that neno, I also made a referral to the agency's Inspector General. if I did it by asking General Counsel to do so. STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 155 DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. I 2 3 General Counsel had the real responsibility for And I have in the back of my mind that I asked Harry Quillian if he would make that 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 saying: I hereby refer you to the Inspector Q. Is that what you had done on the earlier leak inquiry? MR. MCALEER: Objection. THE WITNESS: I believe on the other one, we had sent the letter complaining about the Jay the matter. 2. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) Was that a letter from Fischbein at Kaye, Sholer to Hershkowitz? A. Yes. Q. Before we go any further on this ACC/Lincoln and Mr. Keating himself, and anybody connected with the Bank Board? STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 156 |