2 3 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I would invite you, I don't see any reason to get Judge Bilby involved at this point. MR. MURPHY: I agree. MR. GALLAGHER: There was quite a bit of testimony about referrals before Congress and all that; there may be a waiver issue, and things of that nature. Q.. (BY MR. GALLAGHER) One thing, I guess I want an understanding, and let me know if I can I'm done for the day, but there were зоде 407 examination during the summer of '87. Am I right on my tine frane? An I 17 18 19 correct? Q. Yes. But as a result of, it was as result of the 407 exam later in '87 referrals Yes. Q. I then saw in your testimony or STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. came to 387 2 3 5 6 7 DEPOSITION OF ROSEMARY STEWART VOL. II believe from some source that the DOJ decided not to pursue those, and then I was under the 10 11 MR. MURPHY: This is very sensitive. I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 precision what we can or can't say, and we will let you know. And if you feel a need to go to MR. GALLAGHER : Why don't we conclude the video at this point. We may want to keep the 25 But as far as I'm concerned, the STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 388 3 5 7 10 11 COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) BE IT KNOWN that the foregoing deposition was taken by me pursuant to order of the court; that I was then and there authorized by order of the court to administer an oath; that the witness before testifying was duly sworn by me to testify to the whole truth and nothing but the truth; that the questions propounded by counsel and the answers of the witness thereto were taken down by me in shorthand and thereafter transcribed either by me or under my direction, and that the foregoing pages of printed matter contain a full, true and accurate transcript of all proceedings and testimony had and adduced upon the taking of said deposition all to the best of my skill and ability. I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am in no way related to any of the parties hereto nor am I in any way interested in the outcome hereof. 12 13 DATED at Phoenix, Arizona, this day of 1990. STICKLEY & SCHUTZMAN, INC. 390 Senator Riegle has no present recollection of any substantive conversation with Mr. Atchison at that time or at any time. Although his office records show that Mr. Atchison was scheduled for a short meeting of the afternoon of February 26, 1987. In fact, Senator Riegle, is not certain that any meeting actually took place. in a On some date after the 26th, he received an unsolicited letter signed by Mr. Atchison on Author Young stationary format which was created exclusively by the letter writer. Senator Riegle has since learned that virtually the same letter in the same format -- was addressed and sent to other Senators as well. SPECIAL COUNSEL |