...it can reasonably be read only as the dissent would read it. But we do not agree with that premise: "The notion that because the words of a statute are...also plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification." United States v. Monia, 317 US 424, 431 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). Given our view that there...

...cannot be answered by closing our eyes to everything except the naked words of the Act of June 30, 1906. The notion that because the words of a statute are...plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. It is a wooden English doctrine of rather recent vintage (see Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common...

...from the remainder of the Act. "Area," it is true, means area. But "area of production" means more. "The notion that because the words of a statute are...plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. It is a wooden English doctrine of rather recent vintage * * * to which lip service has on occasion been...

...from the remainder of the Act. "Area," it is true, means area. But "area of production" means more. "The notion that because the words of a statute are...plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. It is a wooden English doctrine of rather recent vintage ... to which lip service has on occasion been...

...Frankfurter when he recently included in one of his extraordinary decisions these significant words : The notion that because the words of a statute are plain, its meaning also is plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. This new trend was reflected by the President...

...further varied by directives, that the Supreme Court has said : "The notion that because the words of n statute are plain, its meaning is also plain, is merely...degrade the Cabinet officers. The bill would place super poirer "i>i the judgment of the Director," even unto 'regimentation bji xubxiiii/ "SEC. 704. (:i) Whenever...

...administrators and judges have given practical meaning to the utterance of a Supreme Court justice that — The notion that because the words of a statute are...also plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. Mr. Justice Frankfurter you will remember used those words dissenting in United States v. Monia, 317...

...administrators and judges have given practical meaning to the utterance of a Supreme Court justice that — The notion that because the words of a statute are...also plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. Mr. Justice Frankfurter you will remember used those words dis- : / seating in United States v. Monia,...

...question cannot be answered by closing our eyes to everything except the naked words of the Act * * *. The notion that because the words of a statute are...plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. It is a wooden English doctrine of rather recent vintage (see Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common...

...[not] a 'Subject to other requirements in the provision not material for purposes of this discussion. '"The notion that because the words of a statute are...plain, is merely pernicious oversimplification. It is a wooden English doctrine of rather recent vintage to which lip service has on occasion been given...