Procedure in Federal Courts: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Sixty-eighth Congress, First Session, on S. 2060, a Bill to Amend the Judicial Code and S. 2061, a Bill to Give the Supreme Court Authority to Make and Publish Rules in Common Law Actions. February 2, 1924U.S. Government Printing Office, 1924 - 82 páginas |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
38 Stat act of March admiralty affirmed American Bar Association appeal or writ appellate jurisdiction application approved bill brought Canal Zone certify questions Chairman circuit courts common law Congress Constitution controversy Court for Alaska Court of Claims courts of appeals direct appeal direct review Dismissed for want district courts District of Columbia docket drawn in question effect equity error or appeal existing law Federal courts final judgments granted habeas corpus proceedings hearing indorsed involved judgment or decree judgments and decrees Judicial Code judicial procedure Judiciary Committee Justice MCREYNOLDS Justice SUTHERLAND Justice VAN DEVANTER lawyers legislation litigant matter Ninth Circuit obligatory jurisdiction paragraph pending petition for certiorari pleading Porto Rico present President provides Revised Statutes Senator CUMMINS Senator OVERMAN Senator SPENCER SHELTON suit superseded by section Supreme Court thereof tion uniform United States Court United States district wherein writ of certiorari writ of error
Passagens conhecidas
Página 25 - The court may at any time unite the general rules prescribed by it for cases in equity with those in actions at law so as to secure one form of civil action and procedure for both...
Página 4 - States is involved, or in causes in which the value in controversy exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars, or in which the title or possession of real estate exceeding in value the sum of...
Página 35 - ... repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States; or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed by either party under the Constitution, or any treaty or statute of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States ; and the power to review under this paragraph may be exercised as well where the federal claim is sustained as where it is denied.
Página 25 - They shall take effect six months after their promulgation, and thereafter all laws in conflict therewith shall be of no further force or effect.
Página 3 - Columbia, it shall be competent for the Supreme Court of the United States, upon the petition of any party thereto...
Página 3 - States, and the decision is in favor of their validity; or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the constitution, or any treaty or statute of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed, by either party, under such constitution, treaty, statute, commission, or authority, may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court upon a writ of...
Página 57 - The practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding in civil causes other than equity and admiralty causes in the circuit and district courts shall conform, as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the State within which such circuit or district courts are held, any rule of court to the contrary notwithstanding.
Página 3 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question...
Página 3 - By appeal, where Is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States and the decision is against its validity. (2) By appeal, where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of any state on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity.
Página 15 - ... in any State court or by or under the authority of any State for any matter involved in the habeas corpus proceeding.