Explaining NATO EnlargementRobert W. Ruchhaus Routledge, 11/01/2013 - 228 páginas This work evaluates the pros and cons of NATO enlargement. It explains why NATO offered membership to three of its Cold War adversaries and makes recommendations about which countries, if any, should be offered membership in the future. |
Índice
1 | |
2 | |
POWER AND PREFERENCES | 21 |
INSTITUTIONS AND CHOICE | 60 |
DOMESTIC POLITICS AND NATIONAL INTERESTS | 125 |
CONCLUSION | 170 |
APPENDICES | 195 |
Notes on Contributors | 207 |
Abstracts | 209 |
213 | |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
actors administration’s Aggarwal agreement allies American analysts argued argument bargaining game benefits Bosnia Bosnian Serbs central Europe central European Clinton administration co-operation Cold Cold War conflict costs countries create CSCE Czech Republic debate decision to enlarge decision-making defence democracies democratic difficult eastern Europe eastern European eastward economic efforts ensure essay Europe’s European security European Union expansion finally financial find first force foreign policy former France future Germany groups Hungary important influence integration issues Kosovo Kupchan leadership Madeleine Albright membership military alliance mission multilateral national interests NATO enlargement NATO expansion NATO’s neorealists North Atlantic Treaty nuclear officials organization theory OSCE outcome Parties Partnership for Peace peacekeeping Poland post-Cold President Clinton question ratification reform regional role Romania Russia Secretary security community Senate Serbia significant Soviet Union specific stability strategic task threat troops United Washington West Western widening World York Yugoslavia