rous or more serious philosophy. In some papers published a few years ago in the Cornhill Magazine, called "Chapters on Talk," a great deal of this delightful and pleasant humor appears. Occupying a foremost position among these, I find a small, but for its size exceedingly vigorous and active member of the garrulous species, to which the name "Perpetual-drop Talker' may perhaps be given with some degree of propriety. In dealing with a new branch of science, I have not said much all this time about good as I am now doing, the use of new terms is inevilisteners. They are scarce, almost as scarce as table, and it is hoped that this one, and such good talkers. A good listener is no egotist, has other technical expressions as have been introbut a moderate opinion of himself, is possessed of duced in the course of these chapters, will be a great desire of information on all kinds of subfavorably received by talk-students generally. jects, and of a hundred other fine qualities. It is The Perpetual-drop Talker then-I will venture too much the general impression that listening is a to consider the term as accepted-is a conversamerely negative proceeding, but such is very far tionalist of a species easily recognisable by all from being really the case. A perfectly inert persons possessed of even moderate acuteness of person is not a good listener, any more than a perception. The chief and most bolster is. remarkable characteristic of him is that his chatter is incessant, and that there issues from his mouth a perpetual dribble of words, which convey to the ears of those who hear them no sort of information worth having, no new thing worth knowing, no idea worth listening to. These talkers are found in the British Isles in great numbers. There is no difficulty in meeting with specimens. If you live in a street, and will only sit at your window for a sufficient length of time, one of them is sure to pass. He has a companion with him, the recipient of that small dropping talk. Perpetual Drop points with his stick, calling his friend's attention to a baker's shop-what is he saying? He is saying, "Ah, German, you Frantzmann, German name. Great many Ger man bakers in London: Germans and Scotch: see: nearly all bakers are either one or the other." You continue to watch, and you observe that this loquacious gentleman is again pointing. Where you see those houses," he is saying now, "there were nothing but green fields when I was a boy. Not a brick to be seen anywhere." And so he goes on commenting on everything. Whatever his senses inform him of, he seems obliged to put on record. "Piebald horse," he says, as one goes by him in an omnibus ; or, "Curious smell," as he passes the fried-fish stall. This is the man with whom we have all travelled in railway-trains. He proclaims to his companion -a person much to be pitied-the names of the stations as the train arrives at each-“Ah, Croy don," he says; or "Ah, Redhill,-going to stop, I see." He makes his comments when they do stop. "Little girl with fruit," he says; or, Boy with papers.' Very likely he will imitate the peculiar cry of this last-" Mornin' papaw,' for his friend's benefit. This kind of talker may be studied very advantageously in railway-trains. He is familiar with technical terms. He remarks, when there is a stoppage, that we are "being shunted on to the up-line till the express goes by.' Presently there is a shriek, and a shake, and a whirl, and then our friend looks round with triumph. "That was it," he says; "Dover express, down-line." This is a very wearying perHe cannot be quiet. If he is positively run out and without a remark to make, he will ask a question. Instead of telling you what the 66 station is, he will in this case ask you to tell him. "What station is this?" is a favorite inquiry with him. He doesn't want to know: he is not going to stop at it: he merely asks because his mouth is full of words, and they must needs dribble out in some form or other. In this case it takes an interrogative form. A tiresome individual this: one cannot help speculating how many times in the course of his life he has thought it necessary to inform his fellow-creatures that the morning has been fine or cold, as the case might be, and the weather generally seasonable, or the reverse. sonage. You require the recipient of your talk to manifest intelligence, to show interest, and, what is more, to feel it. The fact is, that to listen well-as to do anything else well-is not easy. It is not easy even to seem to listen well, as we observe notably in the conduct of bad actors and stage amateurs, who break down in this particular, perhaps more often and more frequently than in any other. But it is even more in his society than in his writing that our friend showed himself as he was. His talking was unlike that of anybody else; it sometimes put me in mind of another voice out of the past. There was an earnest wit, a gentle audacity and simplicity of expression that made it come home to us all. Of late, E. R. was saying he spoke with a quiet and impressive authority that we all unconsciously acknowledged. The end of pain was near. Of his long sufferings he never complained. But if he spoke of himself, it was with some kind little joke or humorous conceit and allusion to the philosophy of endurance, nor was it until after his death that we knew what his martyrhad borne it. dom had been, nor with what courage he He thought of serious things very constantly, although not in the conventional manner. One of the last times that we met he said to me, "I feel more and more convinced that the love of the Father is not unlike that of an earthly father, and that as an earthly father, so He rejoices in the prosperity and material well-doing of his children." Another time, quoting from the Roundabout Papers, he said suddenly, "Be good, my dear.' Depend upon it, that is the whole philosophy of life; it is very simple." Speaking of a friend, he said with some emotion, "I think I love M. as well as if he were dead." He had a fancy, that we all used to laugh over with him, of a great central building, something like the Albert Hall, for friends to live in together, with galleries for the sleepless to walk in at night. Perhaps some people may think that allusions so personal as these are scarcely fitted for the pages of a Magazine, but what is there in truth more unpersonal than the thought of a wise and gentle spirit, of a generous and truthful life? Here is a life that belongs to us all; we have all been the better for the existence of the one man. He could not be good without doing good in his generation, nor speak the truth as he did without adding to the sum of true things. And the lesson that he taught us was—“ Let us be true to ourselves; do not let us be afraid to be ourselves, to love each other and to speak and to trust in each other." Last night the moon rose very pale at first, then blushing flame-like through the drifting vapors as they rose far beyond the downs; a great black-bird sat watching the shifting shadowy worlds from the bare LIFE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. BUT for Pepys and Evelyn we should know but little of the social life of the seventeenth century. A host of letter writers-Walpole, Mrs. Delany, and Mrs. Montagu, at the head of them-may be said to have photographed the next century for us. Lord Malmesbury, Lord Auckland, and some others succeeded; and now we are beginning to have revelations exclusively of the first years of the nineteenth century. The most important contributor to our knowledge in this respect is the late Sir George Jackson, whose recently published volumes will afford us samples of the times in which our grandmothers were young and had swains at their feet-unless war called them away. Gay people on the continent had a bad time of it when war broke out in 1803, and the French government issued orders for the arrest of all English persons on whom hands could be laid. Bath expect ed to be more brilliant than ever by the return of the absentees; but their difficulty branch of a tree, and the colts in the field set off scampering. Later, about eleven o'clock, the mists had dissolved into a silent silver and nightingale-broken dream— in which were vaporous downs, moonlight, sweet sudden stars, and clouds drifting, like some slow flight of silver birds. Ltook us to a little terrace at the end of his father's garden. All the kingdoms of the night lay spread before us, bounded by dreams. For a minute we stood listening to the sound of the monotonous wave that beats away our time in this pleasant place, and then it ceased-and in the utter silence a cuckoo called, and then the nightingale began, and then the wave answered once more. It will all be a dream tomorrow, as we stumble into the noise, and light, and work of life again. Monday comes commonplace, garish, and one can scarce believe in the mystical Sunday night. And yet this tranquil Sunday night is more true than the flashiest gaslamp in Piccadilly. Natural things seem inspired at times, and beyond themselves, and to carry us upwards and beyond our gas-lamps; so do people seem revealed to to us at times in the night, when all is peace.-Cornhill Magazine. All who were in was how to return. France were made prisoners. A precipitate flight of crowds of English travellers from Geneva suddenly took place. They were not safe on any part of the Continent; but some, in disguise and on foot, reached Berlin, others got to the sea and arrived in England; but Bath was not sensible of any increase in numbers or gaiety, for the times were out of joint, though dowagers still played whist and young couples danced minuets. Many of those who were shut up at Verdun chafed under the restraint as intolerable. Some, however, bore it philosophically, others gaily. A few took to French mistresses; other few to French wives. The French officials made "a good thing" out of those who had money, granting them partial liberty for so many days or hours, according to the "consideration." Two or three, having spent hundreds of pounds in their bribes, at last took "French leave," and were lucky in not being recaptured. Their course is not to be commended. We have a higher opinion of Sir Sidney Smith, who, when a prisoner in the Temple, refused to have his parole, used to tell the governor to be vigilant, as he would be off on the first opportunity, and ultimately kept his word, broke prison, and found his painful way to England. The seriousness of the times and their events little affected the Prince of Wales. He was indeed thought to be ill in the early part of 1804; but the illness arose, it was said, from the fact that the Prince and the Duke of Norfolk had been so drunk, for three whole days, that the former at last fell like a pig, and would have died like one, but for prompt and copious bleeding. How rude the "first gentleman" could be, when he chose, to his wife, is well-known. At a drawing room, held by Queen Charlotte in June 1807, when the. Prince and Princess of Wales were present, he took no notice of the Princess. Turn ing his back upon her, he stood between her and the Queen, and as long as the Princess remained he kept up a conversation with his sisters, thereby preventing them from addressing a word to his wife. This feeling against his wife he paraded everywhere. He was jealous of her popularity quite unnecessarily, for she made herself ridiculous, and the subject of scornful criticism, by her lavish display at evening parties of her protuberant beauties. At these parties, the Prince would stare at ladies whom he knew, without speaking to them. His condescending speech was addressed only to his first wife, Mrs. Fitzherbert, and her sister, Lady Haggerstone. The first of these ladies lived at Brighton with the state of a queen and the spirit of a goddess of mirth. Meanwhile, his Royal Highness flirted with his "future Duchess," the Marchioness of Hertford. One of Queen Fitzherbert's merriest tales related how a man had sent to her some lemonade powders he had invented, on the ground that they were highly approved and constantly used by the Marchioness in question. In 1802 Bath was surprised by a visit from the Duke of York. He brought the Duchess with him, and left her there next day. Her friends reported that she had been bitten in the hand by one of her numerous pet dogs, and that the wound was privately pumped upon daily. But the public story was, that his Royal Highness had lost 200,000l. at play, and had been compelled to break up his town establishment. The scandalous story of the Duke and Mrs. Clark, a mistress, who sold places and commissions, is pleasantly balanced by an incident respecting a son of the Duke of Clarence and his mistress, Mrs. Jourdan-Lieutenant Fitzclarence, in 1809. He was in Spain with our army in that year, and he reversed La Fontaine's fable of the mule who was always talking of his mother the mare, but said little of his father the ass. The Lieutenant was the foolish aide-de-camp of a foolish General Shaw, who was always showing him about to the Spaniards, as the King of England's grandson. That grandson was about to be despatched on a mission to the Continent in 1813, but ministers changed their minds. They were afraid he would write everything to his father, who would publish it in Bond Street; and so the gentleman was kept at home to sun himself in the bow window at White's. The grandest fête of sixty years since was the one given by the Prince, at Carlton House, in 1811. The King was in such ill health and the Princess Amelia in such a precarious condition that it was often deferred; and Jekyll remarked that no one could ever again say," Fixed as fate!" At length it came off, and, for one happy invited guest, made a hundred mad who were not invited. The Queen and Princesses declined to be present; but Louis the Eighteenth and the sad-looking Duchess of Angoulême appeared there, and the Prince received the former as a sovereign de facto. "I am only a Comte de Lille," said Louis modestly. "Sire," said the Prince," you are the King of France and Navarre ;" and he treated his guest accordingly. Both the Prince's wives (Mrs. Fitzherbert and the Princess of Wales) sat at home by themselves; but the "favorite" was honored by a command to a ttend the festival. One of the Prince's ideas was to divorce his second wife and shut her up in Holyrood House for ever. This grand fête, it may be added, was soon forgotten in the excitement caused by the fight that was to come off between the Baltimore negro, Molyneux, and the chief of English boxers, Tom Cribb! was a time, moreover, when later hours began to be fashionable. We hear of a ball It lasting from twelve till eight; and of another at which the majority of dancers kept it up till ten in the morning. We go back a couple of years, in order to remark that in 1809, while there was no lack of enjoyment among optimists, the press saw the worst side of everything; and the Times especially denied or explained away our victories generally, and that of Talavera in particular. The public seem to have been almost as ill-informed as to what was being done abroad as they are now by our own correspondents," who are sent to describe battlefields or other troublesome matters, and who write columns on the boiling of their eggs and the obstinacy of their laundresses. "It is too much," says Jackson, "to hear the victory of Talavera called in question by the Times; a victory as honorable to British arms and British generalship as any they ever achieved. That paper should be offered up as a sacrifice to the manes of the heroes who fell on the Alberche. I have not patience to read it." In 1814 the Prince Regent had a narrow escape for his life. On one of his evenings of ennui he sent for George Colman to come from the King's Bench, where he was a prisoner, to amuse him. Court jester and prince, they passed the night, drinking and fooling, till six o'clock, when his Highness was carried to bed in an apoplexy, from which he only recovered at the cost of seven and twenty ounces of blood! He was as near death at this critical juncture as a man could be and yet live. His constitution, however, carried him through. When the allied sovereigns entered London he was ready for all the duties and eager for all the pleasures that the occasion offered; but he shocked some people on one occasion by presiding at a public dinner on a Sunday. That English society wanted refinement in the first decade of the present century is not to be disputed. When Mr. Jackson returned from long diplomatic service abroad in 1806, he dined one day at Lord Westmoreland's. The guests were chiefly Russians. They were as much out of their element in English society as the young diplomatist says he was after the sociability, ease and elegance of the society at foreign courts to which he had so long been accustomed. Some of that foreign society was quite as free as it was easy. Jackson and other Englishmen at the Prussian court were admitted to the morning toilette of Madame de Vos, the King of Prussia's grande maîtresse. While under the hands of her hairdresser she laughed and flirted. with the English lords and gentlemen, who paid tribute to her beauty and its uses by making her presents of wine and tea, and other English matters, which she greedily accepted. There are three things, says the Welsh proverb, which always swallow and are never satisfied-the grave, the sea, and a king's concubine. Austerlitz killed Pitt as surely as Trafalgar killed Nelson. Each died for his country, but that country mourned more deeply for the great admiral, stricken down in the battle where he was the victor, than it did for the great minister who died of a broken heart. The last book he read, at Bath, was Miss Owenson's (Lady Morgan's) Novice of St. Dominic.' That now unreadable romance, Pitt said, he could not lay down till he had finished it, and thence did the Novice' come to be the rage for a time. People almost fought to obtain it at the libraries, and nothing in literature was talked of but a book which has long since fallen out of literature and of memory altogether. People, too, fought for another novel, 'A Winter in London,' in which fashionable life was illustrated by an incapable whose name and whose work are equally wrapt in oblivion. Fox did not long survive his great rival Pitt. He died on the 13th of September, 1806. A week previously, when he was already dying, he transacted public business. He gave an audience in his bedroom to George Jackson, with instructions as to how the latter was to act on his new mission to Germany. There was a mixture of the solemn and the ludicrous in the scene. When Jackson was announced Mrs. Fox, in complete dishabille, was in the room. In her flurry she slipped into a closet, and, as the interview was prolonged, the lightly-draped lady kept signalling to Mr. Fox, as if he alone could hear her, by little coughs and murmurs, to warn him not to over-exert himself, or to dismiss the envoy, that she might be set free. At a moment when there was a pause in the conversation between the minister and his agent the fair captive tapped at the panel, asked if the young gentleman was not gone, and complained of being cold. The dying statesman looked at Jackson with a languid smile, and with friendly wishes bade him farewell -as it proved, for ever. Descending to minor legislators, we meet with an Irish M.P., who, being told that the favor he asked would be granted on condition of his supporting goverment, replied that he would not give his constant support for so paltry a favor. The Irish member obtained the favor, and voted twice for government in payment for it. This was better diplomacy than Sir Charles Stuart's (Marquis of Londonderry), who, when named to a post in Germany, told people that he was going to Spain, by way of being diplomatic. We were unlucky in our leading diplomatists generally at that time. Lord Aberdeen may serve as an example. He went to Toplitz, as English ambassador, and had the bad taste and idiotic indiscretion to say one day, openly at dinner, that he could not bear the undertaking, and would not go on with it to keep the crowns on the allied heads! One qualification was necessary to even a decently moderate success, namely, the ability to speak French; but Lord Aberdeen not only could not speak two words of French, but had the folly to tell everybody who addressed him in that language that he hated it. There was in some persons as much bad taste in acts as there was in others in words; and it is not without surprise that we hear of gen. tlemen sight-seers who would pass the morning amid the horrors of a field of recent battle, and the evening at the play, philandering with ladies and talking an infinite deal of nothing. On another occasion, we hear of the gayest and most gigantic of picnics, where luxury abounded, while, within a few miles, French soldiers were dropping dead with hunger as they slowly retreated. Mrs. Fitzherbert was in the early part of the century the Queen of Brighton, if not of England, and she was popularly called "Mrs. Prince." She certainly was one of the most queen-like women that ever lived; and stood in favorable contrast with Lady Holland, who is justly described as fussy, almost rude, straining at effect, and losing it in the very effort. There was another lady then in England striving to be effective, Madame de Staël; and she (who horrified Henry Brougham) was pronounced by female critics as "too anxious to glitter to be intrinsically good." A still more remarkable woman of that day was Lady Caroline Lamb. She was at a party at Lady Heathcote's, had been flirting and quarrelling with Lord Byron, and therefore "stabbed herself with a knife at supper, so that the blood flew about her neighbors." When she came to, after a faint, a glass of water was handed to her, but she smashed the glass and cut herself with the pieces. "A little discipline," said Francis Jackson, “will bring these school-girl fancies into order." A good deal of disorder was to be found at breakfast as well as at supper-tables. Lady Caroline Hood was, probably, counselled not to go to the Regent's "breakfast "; but ladies will, under certain circumstances, disregard friends and doctors also. Lady Caroline went, and had only herself to blame when she had to be carried away wrapped up in blankets. Mrs. Fitzherbert's conduct at Brighton was not always in the best taste. Mrs. Gunn, the bathing-woman, invariably addressed her as " Mrs. Prince"; but the latter did not live at the level of that dignity. She held afternoon gossips in her little drawing room, hung with black profiles (her salon aux silhouettes). Only guests of distinction were admitted here to exchange the stories of the day for piquant anecdotes and a cup of tea. There, too, M. le Prince was a subject of discussion. His sayings and doings were pretty freely handled. It was all done with gusto, and elicited much mirth; but some visitors, who were glad to be there, professed to think it all very very naughty and in the worst taste. She The fair one who had the reputation of being fairest where all were fair-the reigning queen of beauty in fact-was Miss Rumbold, daughter of Sir George. was a "dashing" beauty; but if to be beautiful was not common, to be dashing was to be fashionable. Accordingly, we find Miss Rumbold attended so little to the hints and admonitions of the Bishop of Durham, that the love of showing off an amazingly fine ankle prevented more than one offer from among the crowd of her adorers. The same pretty vanity was strong in the Princess Charlotte, at a later period, but Prince Leopold was not kept thereby from being a suitor. It may be concluded that gentlemen were, after all, not so particular as the adorers of Miss |