...anthorities; but nevertheless we cannot forbear qnoting from the opinion in Mugler v. Kantns, supra: "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community cannot in any just sense be deemed a taking or appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the...

...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to Ьеда injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any justg sense, be...

...court held that a prohibition elmply upon the use of property for purposes declared by the Legislature to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of...appropriation of property for the public benefit" (123 US 668, 669, 8 Sup. Ct. 301, 31 L. Ed. 205), for the reason that the owner is not disturbed In...

...eminent domain, in the jxercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking, or Opinion of the Court. an appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not...

...compensating them for the diminution in its value resulting from such prohibitory enactments. A prohibition upon the use of property for purposes that are declared...to the health, morals, or safety of the community, is not an appropriation of property for the public benefit, in the sense in which a taking of property...

...them for the diminution in its value' resulting from such prohibitory enactments. '* A prohibition upon the use of property for purposes that are declared...to the health, morals or safety of the / community, is not an appropriation of property for the public benefit, / in the sense in which a taking of property...

...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are deelared by valid legislation to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community cannot...

...authorities, but, nevertheless, we can not forbear quoting from the opinion inMugler \. Kansas, xupra; "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...to the health, morals, or safety of the community, can not, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit....

...law-making power, upon reasonable grounds, declares to be prejudicial to the general welfare." And again: " A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or aii appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in...

...the land, that a State has power, by valid legislation, to prohibit the use of property it declares to be injurious to the health, morals or safety of the community ; or that in the Ficklen case, relative to the State power, to tax all property having a situs within...