| United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1950 - 824 páginas
...Holdsworth, sameness of effect upon the eye. is the main test of substantial identity of design, the only remaining question upon this part of the case, is...below was of opinion that the test of a patent for * design is not the eye of an ordinary observer. The learned Judge thought there could be no infringement... | |
| 1873 - 532 páginas
...is the main test of substantial identity of design. Ib. 3. It is not essential to identity of design that the appearance should be the same to the eye of an expert. If, in the eye of an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs... | |
| 1873 - 120 páginas
[ O conteúdo desta página está restrito ] | |
| 1873 - 438 páginas
[ O conteúdo desta página está restrito ] | |
| Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 816 páginas
...substantial identity of design. Statement of the case. 3. It is not essential to identity of design that the appearance should be the same to the eye of an expert. If, in the eye of an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs... | |
| United States. Patent Office - 1883 - 616 páginas
...is sameness of appearance, in other words, sameness of effect upon the eye; that it is not necessary that the appearance should be the same to the eye of an expert, and that the test is the eye of an ordinary observer, the eyes of men generally, of observers of ordinary... | |
| Orlando Bump - 1884 - 912 páginas
...Fish. 94; sc 14 Wall. 511 ; TBlatch. 513 ; s. C. 2 OG 593. To constitute an infringement, it is not essential that the appearance should be the same to the eye of an expert. Such a test would destroy all the protection which the statute intended to give. There never could... | |
| United States. Patent Office - 1889 - 700 páginas
...Jfolisicortti) sameness of effect upon the eye, is the main test of substantial identity of design, the only remaining question upon this part of the case is,...the test of a patent for a design is not the eye of :ui ordinary observer. The learned judge thought there could be no iniringenient unless there was "substantial... | |
| |