...the tidal waters of the Ware River. The right of Virginians in Virginia waters, the Court said, was "a property right, and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship." And an analogy was drawn between planting oysters in a river bed and planting corn in state-owned land....

...is, in effect, nothing more than a regulation of the use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the state thus acquire comes...and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship. 94 US 395. The right of citizens of Virginia to fish in the public waters of the state, therefore,...

...is in effect nothing more than a regulation of the use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the state thus acquire comes...not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship." (94 US 395.) The right of citizens of Virginia to fish in the public waters of the state, therefore,...

...Is, in effect, nothing more than a regulation of ths use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the state thus acquire comes...not a mere privilege or Immunity of citizenship." Consequently, the decision was that the citizens of one state were not invested by the constitution...

...is in effect nothing more than a regulation of the use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the state thus acquire comes...and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship. § 822. Article b section 8, of the federal constitution does not invest the citizens of one state...

...navigable streams within its jurisdiction. Chief Justice Waite, speaking for the court, says : "The right which the people of the State thus acquire comes...and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship. See also Sterling v. Jackson, 69 Mich. 488 ; Hall v. Alford, 38 LRA 205 ; Cobb v. Davenport, 32 NJL...

...its navigable waters, and the rights of fishing in such waters, and that, as Waite, CJ, said,2 "the right which the people of the state thus acquire comes...but from their citizenship and property combined," and " it is, in fact, a property right and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship," and, therefore,...

...waters, and that, as Waite, CJ, said,2 "the right which the people of the state thus acquire contes not from their citizenship alone, but from their citizenship and property combined," and " it is, in fact, a property right and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship," and, therefore,...

...is in effect nothing more than a regulation of the use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the State thus acquire comes...citizenship and property combined. It is, in fact, a property-right, and not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship. " By Art. IV., Sect. 2, of the...

...is in effect nothing more than a regulation of the use by the people of their common property. The right which the people of the State thus acquire comes...not a mere privilege or immunity of citizenship." In Smith v. Maryland, I8 How. 71, 74, a vessel licensed to be employed in the coasting trade and fisheries,...