...and other amendments to our Constitution imply the same doctrine. The Supreme Court has declared : The very purpose of a bill of rights was to withdraw...to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a Iree press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rlgbts may not be submitted to vote...

...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia, Board of Education v. Bamette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend...

...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend...

...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (319U.S. 624,638 (1943)): "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to * * * freedom of worship * * * and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend...

...Justice Jackson for the Court in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to ... freedom of worship . . . and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend...

...liberty in our country. The intent of the Bill of Rights, as Justice Jackson declared, in 319 US 624, "was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes...principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to * * * freedom of worship * * * and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote: they depend...

...Virginia State Boar/I of Education v. Rnrnrttc, 319 US 624. 63 S. Ct. 1178, 87 L. Ed. 1628, 147 ALR 674: 'The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's riiílit tu life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedoom of worship and assembly,...

...vicissitudes of political controversy — • Take them out of the community controversy, the school board controversy — to place them beyond the reach of...them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. Legal principles for each individual : I go, Dr. Cohen, to your statement on page 6, in which you say...

...subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of ma joritie* and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. The argument is pressed, and it has been pressed by other witnesses today, and previously before this...

...us more than 20 years ago (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 638 (1943) ) : "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw...as legal principles to be applied by the courts." The pending bill would guard against subversion of this fundamental purpose of the Bill of Rights....