...a party to the suit, or admission* implied from his conduct, are strong evidence against him ; but he is at liberty to prove that such admissions were mistaken or untrue, and is not estopped or concluded by them, unless another person has been induced by them to alter his condition...

...Id. 295. * Though, in England, the «hep-book of a tradesman it not evidence of a debt, ADMISSIONS. The express admissions of a party to the suit, or admissions implied from his conduct, are strong evidence against him ; but he is at liberty to prove that such admissions were mistaken or untrue,...

...Court lays down the principle of estoppel thus: " There is uo doubt but that the express admission of a party to the suit, or admissions implied from his conduct, nre evidence, and strong evidence, against him ; but we think that he is at liberty to prove that such...

...v. Rogers (c): Mr. Justice Bayley, in delivering the judgment of the Court in that case, says — " There is no doubt but that the express admissions...liberty to prove that such admissions were mistaken, or were untrue, and is not estopped or concluded by them, unless another person has been induced by them...

...v. Rogers (c): Mr. Justice Bayley, in delivering the judgment of the Court in that case, says — " There is no doubt but that the express admissions...liberty to prove that such admissions were mistaken, or were untrue, and is not estopped or concluded by them, unless another person has been induced by them...

...acquiescence was fully gone into in the case of Heane v. Rogers(a), where the Court said, that although the express admissions of a party to the suit, or admissions implied from his conduct, are evidence against him, yet that he is at liberty to prove that such admissions were mistaken or were untrue,...

...marriage. (2) 9 B. & C. 5S6,by Bayley, J. The case determined that a bankdown in these terms :—" The express admissions of a party to the suit, or...are evidence, and strong evidence against him ; but he is at liberty to prove, that such admissions were mistaken or were untrue, and he is not estopped...

...the suit, or admissions implied from his conduct, are evidence, and strong evidence against him ; but he is at liberty to prove, that such admissions were mistaken or were untrue, and he is not estopped or concluded by them, unless another person has been induced by...

...will act as an estoppel ; and in Heane v. Rogers (re) Bayley, J., says : — " There is no doubt but the express admissions of a party to the suit, or...to prove that such " admissions were mistaken, or were untrue, and is not estopped by them "unless another person has been induced by them to alter his...

...discharged irregular and void, or might have been mistaken by the plaintiff. (8) «s «n insolvent. " The express admissions of a party to the suit, or admissions implied EFFECT OF ADfrom his conduct, are evidence, and strong evidence against him ; but he is ISM""Sat liberty...