 | 1816 - 452 páginas
...bill, and if instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...bill would have the effect of prejudicing any of the 1814. CALLOW Li WRt NCI!. [97] VOL. III. (a) 3 TR 80. F 1814. indorsers. In Beck v. Robley, if the... | |
 | 1816 - 644 páginas
...bill, and if instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...the bill, that the holder should be at liberty to «ue the acceptor. The case would be different if the circulation of the bill would have the effect... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1828 - 810 páginas
...bill; and if, instead of suing the acceptor, lie put it into circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...would be different if the circulation of the bill wottld have the effect of prejudicing any of the indorsers." -•AX .nwr.ih .•.<;,....' Rule refused.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1828 - 864 páginas
...upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who have indorsed it, that the holder should be at liberty to sue the acceptor....have the effect of prejudicing any of the indorsers." Rule refused. 14 1827. Nov. 10th. In an action, against an underwriter, on a policy of assurance on... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1828 - 878 páginas
...it; and if, instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who have indorsed it, that the holder should be at liberty to sue the acceptor. The case would be different if the circulation... | |
 | Great Britain. Bail Court, Thomas William Saunders, Henry Thomas Cole - 1849 - 392 páginas
...bill, and if, instead of suing the acceptor, he puts it in circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...holder should be at liberty to sue the acceptor." In the case of Lazarm v. Cowie (6), Lord Denman, CJ, says, " It cannot be denied that if a bill be... | |
 | John Barnard Byles - 1853 - 664 páginas
...bill ; and if, instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation on his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...the holder should be at liberty to sue the acceptor. "(I) The drawer of a bill payable to his own order, indorsed it over, and, on the bill being dishonoured,... | |
 | John Barnard Byles - 1856 - 684 páginas
...bill ; and if, instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation on his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...should be at liberty to sue the acceptor."(?) The drawer of a bill payable to his own order, indorsed it over, and, on the bill being (A-) Bartrum v.... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1857 - 936 páginas
...; and if, instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into circulation upon his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who have indorsed the hill that the holder should be ut liberty to sue the acceptor. The case would be different if the circulation... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1861 - 840 páginas
...bill, and if instead of suing the acceptor he put it into circulation on his own indorsement only, it does not prejudice any of the other parties who...the holder should be at liberty to sue the acceptor" (a). But the drawer of an accommodation bill is in the same situation as the acceptor of a bill for... | |
| |
A bill of exchange is negotiable ad infinitum until it has been paid by or discharged on behalf of the acceptor. If the drawer has paid the bill, it seems that he may sue the acceptor upon the bill, and if instead of suing the acceptor, he put it into... 
