...v. Michi9an, 135 CJ. S. 161, 166: " We have repeatedly held that no State has the right to lay a tax on inter-State commerce in any form, whether by way...from that transportation, or on the occupation or busmess ot carrying it on, for the reason that taxation is a burden on that commerce, and amounts to...

...derived from that transportation, or ou the oooupatlou or business of carrying it on, and the reason is that such taxation is a burden on that commerce and...regulation of it, which belongs solely to Congress. This is the result of so many recent cases that citation is hardly necessary. As a matter of convenient...

...doctrine and even the language of the decision in the Ficklen case. They say: " No State can levy a tax on interstate commerce in any form, whether by way of duties laid upon the transportation of the subjects of that commerce, or on the receipts derived from that transportation,...

...a construction of the constitution leads to the conclusion that nostate has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form whether by way...or on the occupation or business of carrying it on, and the reason is that such taxa- • tion is a- burden on that commerce, and amounts to a regulation...

...interstate commerce in any form whatever by way of duties laid on the transportation of the subject of that commerce? , •or on the receipts derived...or on the occupation or business of carrying it on; and the reason is that such Taxation is a burden on that commerce, and amounts to a regulation of it,...

...companies is clearly stated by Chief Justice Fuller in a recent case. He says: "It is settled that where, by way of duties laid on the transportation of the subjects of interstate commerce, or on the receipts derived therefrom, or on the occupation or business of carrying...

...construction of the Constitution in all its parts. It is this: "No state has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form, whether by way of duties laid on transportation of the subjects of that, or on the receipts derived from that transportation, or on...

...baa been repeatedly anewered by this court to the effect "that no etate has the right to lay a tax 깸! * K b ~7 , :B AGa u ht LV b iB V/ ӆs 6 ... z 5pq y< F1 # {T 0Va Sz E< < ׄ ~]9"v+ Lyng v. Michigan, 135 US 166, 34 L. ed. 153, 3 Inters. Com. Rep. 140, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 726. But if...

...commercial clause of the constitution — is unsound. It is well settled that a state cannot lay a tax upon interstate commerce in any form, whether by way of...transportation of the subjects of that commerce, or the receipts derived from that transportation, or on the occupation or business of carrying it on,...

...commerce, this court said (page 695, 155 US, and page 269, 15 J5 Sup. Ct): » *"It is settled that where, by way of duties laid on the transportation of the subjects of interstate commerce, or on the receipts derived therefrom, or on the occupation or business of carrying...