...not a mere general reference to public welfare but as shown by the context and purposes of the Act has direct relation to adequacy of transportation...provision and best use of transportation facilities." Texas v. United States, 292 US 522, 531. Appellees do not challenge the Commission's contention that...

...stated, "The provisions now before us were among the additions made by the Transportation Act, 1920, and the term 'public interest' as thus used is not a concept...itself in the exercise of the authority conferred." Other parties filing briefs refer to the same statutory provisions, criteria, and the cases cited....

...12: The provisions now before us were among the additions made by the Transportation Act, 1920, and the term "public Interest" as thus used is not a concept...Commission has constantly addressed itself in the eiercise of the authority conferred. Again, in referring to the powers of this Commission in ALA Schechter...

...Central Securities v. United States, 287 US 12 (1932), at page 25: * * * The term 'public interest' * * * is not a concept without ascertainable criteria, but...Itself in the exercise of the authority conferred. * * * The "public interest" criterion is therefore not the equivalent of the "public convenience and...

...act, in New fork Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 287 US 12, 25, the court said that it^is not a concept without ascertainable criteria, but...itself in the exercise of the authority conferred. Speaking of the rule of rate-making embodied in Emergency Railroad Transportation Act, 1933, the court...

...used in section 5 of the act relating to unifications of carriers, the Supreme Court has said that it is not "a concept without ascertainable criteria,...provision and best use of transportation facilities." New York Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 287 US 12, 25 ; see also Texas v. United States,...

...not a mere general reference to public welfare, but, as shown by the context and purpose of the Act, "has direct relation to adequacy of transportation...provision and best use of transportation facilities." The applicants contend that the conditions as ,to employees relate to a subject matter over which we...

...not a mere general reference to public welfare, but. as shown by the context and purpose of the Act. 'has direct relation to adequacy of transportation...provision and best use of transportation facilities'. New York Central Securities Corp. v. United Stares, supra. It is in the light of this criterion that...

...act, in New York Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 287 US 12, 25, the court said that it>is not a concept without ascertainable criteria, but...service, to its essential conditions of economy and efflr ciency, and to appropriate provision and best use of transportation facilities, questions to...

...not define public interest but, as shown by context and purpose of the act, the public interest has relation to adequacy of transportation service, to...economy and efficiency, and to appropriate provision for, and the best use of, transportation facilities. Texas v. United Statei, 292 US 522. Boston & PR...